8 September, 2021 - Daily Current Affairs Analysis & MCQs - The Daily News Simplified from The Hindu
- Making them Pay: Need for Made in India Appstore Indian Economy
- Management of Epidemics: Constraints and Strategies needed Disaster Management
- The Economic Reforms- Looking back to look ahead Indian Economy
- Vidyanjali 2.0 Scheme Government Schemes
- Refining the Reservation Policy- Reference
- Question for the Day
UPSC Current Affairs: Making them Pay: Need for Made in India Appstore | Page – 06 UPSC Syllabus: GS Paper III - Indian economy
Sub Theme: Dominance of Big Tech in Indian economy | UPSC
In order to ensure digital sovereignty and Aatma Nirbhar Bharat in App ecosystem, some of the experts have pointed out that India needs to have its own home- grown Appstore like Google's Play store or Apple's App store. This will enable us to combat the monopoly of these technological giants and give push for digital economy.
Hence, keeping these developments taking place in India and USA, we would focus on following dimensions: • How Big Tech companies have gained dominant market position?
- How dominance of Big Tech hurt economy?
- Need for Made in India Appstore
- What should be done to break the monopoly of MNCs in Mobile App ecosystem?
- What has to be done to deal with dominance of Big Tech at Global level?
How Big Tech companies have gained dominant market position?
Role of Online Platforms as Gatekeepers: As Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google have captured control over key channels of distribution, they have come to function as gatekeepers. Their role as gatekeepers also gives the dominant platforms to control the fates of other businesses.
For example, In 2007, Google bought Android OS which is used for running the smart phones. Then, Google called upon the smartphone manufacturers to pre-install and give default status to Google’s own apps such as Chrome, Google Map etc. Through Chrome, Google now owns the world’s most popular browser, a critical gateway to the internet. Through Google Maps, Google now captures over 80% of the market for navigation mapping service. And through Google Cloud, it is now positioning itself to dominate the “Internet of Things,” the next wave of surveillance technologies.
Acquisition of Competitors: The Big tech companies have also resorted to acquisition of smaller competitors to retain their dominant market position. For example, Facebook acquired WhatsApp and Instagram to continue its dominance in the field of social media.
Collection, storage and Analysis of Data: The Big tech companies enjoy dominance with respect to amount of data collected by them. Companies with superior access to data can use that data to better target users. This in turn makes smaller companies to depend upon Google, Amazon etc. for advertising their products.
Discriminatory Practices: Companies such as Amazon force their sellers to sell their products only on their platform. Further, companies such as Google give higher preference to the companies which place their advertisement with them. For example, when you search for a particular product on Google search engine, the Google automatically gives higher preference to the products which are advertised on its platform.
Higher Economies of scale and Scope also enable these Big Tech companies to have profits as compared to their smaller rivals.
How dominance of Big Tech hurt economy?
Hinders Innovation: Competition in digital markets incentivizes incumbent firms and new entrants to build new technologies and improve business processes. In case of monopolisation, the incumbent firms lack the incentive to invest in research and development.
Data Privacy Issues: Misuse of personal data of the users to make profits.
Hinders Start-up Ecosystem: Monopoly enjoyed by deep-pocketed Big tech companies would prevent growth of start-up companies.
Affects Consumers: Monopolised market is usually characterised by higher prices and poor quality of services. Exercise pervasive influence on society and politics which could affect process of democratisation. Take for instance, the role of Social media in spreading fake news, hatred, communal disharmony etc.
Need for Made in India Appstore
Abuse of Dominant Position by Google and Apple: Presently, there are more than 300+ app stores from where one can download mobile apps. Some of these App stores are Google's play store, Apple's Appstore, Samsung's Galaxy store, Amazon Appstore etc. In spite of availability of so many choices, most of us use either Google play store or Apple Appstore to download apps depending upon the operating system of our phone. It is because our phones come pre-loaded with these in-built app stores and hence this in a way limits our choice of Appstore to download mobile apps.
Unfair Practices: The dominance enjoyed by Google and Apple in their OS has enabled them to extend their dominance in other aspects of mobile ecosystem such as App stores, mobile apps etc. Both Google and Apple collect payments from App developers to get their Apps listed on their respective Appstore. Apple also requires the App developers to pay 30% as commission for the in-app purchases made by App developers. Even Google had also decided to impose commission on the App developers. However, on account of opposition by App developers, Google decided to defer it by 1 year.
Lack of Choice to Consumers and App developers in terms of accessing and listing mobile apps.
Set back to Domestic App Ecosystem: The Indian Domestic mobile app Industry has been growing by leaps and bounds. PM Modi has recently highlighted that digital gaming has a huge potential at the international level and called upon Indian entrepreneurs to take a lead and develop apps to boost mobile app ecosystem. But, in the present ecosystem, an entrepreneur faces multiple costs as well as risks as shown below:
- Required to pay charges and commission to get their Apps listed.
- Required to comply with unfair rules and regulations laid down by Big Tech
- In absence of regulation, there is a risk of app being delisted without any mechanism for redressal of his grievances.
So, having an Indigenously developed Appstore would help us address these problems faced by app developers. Further, the regulation of Appstore through an Independent authority would help us lay down clear rules and guidelines over aspects of listing of mobile apps.
What should be done to break the monopoly of MNCs in Mobile App ecosystem?
Mobile Seva App Store: M-Governance application store hosts the various mobile applications for government services as well as private sector mobile apps. Applications can be developed by independent developer or Department, which after testing and verification processes, can be hosted on Mobile Sevaapp store free of cost. This needs to be developed as viable alternative to Appstore of Google and Apple.
Encouraging development of Mini-App Stores: Paytm has recently launched Mini-App store. In normal Appstore, one needs to download the application in the phone to access it. However, the Mini-App store is a web-based service that provides access to various apps as if they are downloaded on your mobile. For example, if you want to access Uber, ola or swiggy, you can download it from Google play store. Or in case of Mini-app store, you need to go to Paytm app and click on the link to the concerned app, then these apps would open within the web browser without getting installed on your phone.
Two advantages here- Saves phone memory and saves Data which otherwise gets used up for downloading the mobile app. In a way, Mini-App store can be considered as "Super-Apps" which provide web-based access to other apps without downloading them.
Encouraging development of local handsets: We have to realise that we cannot be self-reliant in the field of Mobile app ecosystem without being self-reliant in Mobile manufacturing. Most of the mobile phones sold in India are Chinese and these come pre-loaded with their own apps and play stores. So, we need to boost the Indigenous manufacturing of Mobile phones. Just like how the Android OS comes pre-loaded with Google applications, we can ensure that mobile phones manufactured in India come pre-loaded with our Appstore such as MobileSeva App store.
What has to be done to deal with dominance of Big Tech?
Strengthening the Antitrust Laws: The anti-trust laws such as Competition Act, 2002 need to be strengthened; Empower Competition Commission of India to deal with abuse of dominant market position by Big Tech companies.
Breaking up the Big Tech:
There are basically 3 proposals to reduce the dominance of the Big Tech by breaking them. 1. Platforms should evolve into separate companies: This proposal would break up tech companies by separating the underlying platform from the products and services sold on it. Google could no longer own Android and offer apps like Gmail, Maps, and Chrome. Amazon could no longer own the Amazon Marketplace and sell its own private-label goods. Apple could no longer own iOS and offer products like Safari, Siri, or Find My iPhone.
- Restrict the number of products the Big Tech can offer
- Reversal of past acquisitions which enabled Big Tech Companies to enjoy dominance.
UPSC Current Affairs: Management of Epidemics: Constraints and Strategies needed | Page – 06 UPSC Syllabus: GS Paper III – Disaster Management
Sub Theme: Biological Disasters | UPSC
In recent years, biological disasters including bioterrorism have assumed serious dimensions as they pose a greater threat to health, environment and national security. The risks and vulnerabilities of our food chain and agricultural sector to agroterrorism, which involves the deliberate introduction of plant or animal pathogens with the intent of undermining socio-economic stability.
develop a holistic, coordinated, proactive and technology driven strategy for management of biological disasters through a culture of prevention, mitigation and preparedness.
Biological disasters are scenarios involving disease, disability or death on a large scale among humans, animals and plants due to toxins or disease caused by live organisms or their products. Such disasters may be natural in the form of epidemics or pandemics of existing, emerging or reemerging diseases and pestilences or man made by the intentional use of disease causing agents in Biological Warfare (BW) operations or incidents of Bioterrorism (BT).
NEED TO FOCUS ON BIOLOGICAL DISASTERS:
Large Scale Death and Socio-Economic Impact: Epidemics can result in heavy mortalities in the short term leading to a depletion of population with a corresponding drop in economic activity, e.g., the plague epidemics in Europe during the middle ages or the Spanish influenza between 1917–18. Another example is the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)/Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) epidemic in Sub
Saharan Africa, that has wiped out the benefits of improved health care and decimated the productive segments of society leading to economic stagnation and recession.
The outbreak of plague in Surat (1994) after a gap of 28 years, with over 1,000 suspected cases and 52 deaths, caused widespread panic and mass exodus of people from the affected areas
The spread of Nipah, Hendra, Ebola, Marburg and Lassa fever viruses are examples of this phenomenon Constant Evolution in Infectious Agents: Infectious agents are constantly evolving, often acquiring enhanced virulence or epidemic potential. This results in normally mild infections becoming serious. The outbreak of Chikungunya that started in 2005 is one such example.
Increased Globalisation which has led to increase in the spread of diseases from one country to another. Growth of Biological Weapons: The advances in bacteriology, virology and immunology in the late 19th century and early 20th century enabled nations to develop biological weapons. The use of some agents such as anthrax by terrorist groups pose a serious threat. The ease of production, packaging and delivery using existing non-military facilities are major factors in threat perception.
Framework in India
According to the constitution, health is a state subject. The primary responsibility of dealing with biological disasters rests with the state government. There are a number of legislations that control and govern the nation’s health policies. MoH&FW is the nodal ministry for handling epidemics. providing guidance and technical support for capacity development in surveillance, early detection of any outbreak and supporting the states during outbreaks in terms of outbreak investigations, deployment of Rapid Response Teams (RRTs), manpower and logistic support for case management, etc
Epidemic Diseases Act (Act 111 of 1897) provides for ‘better prevention and spread of dangerous epidemic diseases’. This Act, still in force, provides the states the authority to designate any of its officers or agencies to take measures for the prevention and control of epidemics.
Disaster Management Act (DM Act), 2005: measures for the prevention or mitigation of disaster.
International Health Regulations [IHR (2005): prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease. Member States are required to strengthen their core capacity to detect, report and respond rapidly to public health events and to notify WHO, within 24 hours, of all events that may constitute a PHEIC.
Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC): The Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, which came into force on 26 March 1975, provides for prohibition of the development, production and stockpiling of bacteriological (biological) and toxin weapons and for their destruction.
Strengthen Legal Framework: The Epidemic Diseases Act was enacted in 1897 and needs to be repealed. This Act does not provide any power to the centre to intervene in biological emergencies. It has to be substituted by an Act which takes care of the prevailing and foreseeable public health needs including emergencies such as BT attacks and use of biological weapons by an adversary, cross-border issues, and international spread of diseases. It should give enough powers to the central and state governments and local authorities to act with impunity, notify affected areas, restrict movement or quarantine the affected area, enter any premises to take samples of suspected materials and seal them.
Institutional Framework: There is need for an agency that can incorporate stakeholders and experts to oversee this aspect on a continuing basis. The National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity set up by the US Department of Health and Human Sciences could be emulated in our country. A model plan will be prepared by the nodal ministry with the help of an advisory committee, which will be updated periodically. The perceived threat would be the basis for anticipating and executing action. The advisory committee would have strong links with NDMA.
Operational Framework: At the national level, there is no policy on biological disasters. Need to come out with SOP for dealing with Biological Disasters.
Financial Framework: DM has earmarked funds for emergency response which the state can operate, namely the Calamity Relief Fund (CRF) and the National Calamity Contingency Fund (NCCF). However, the disasters for which CRF and NCCF can be utilised are defined. Biological disasters do not fall into this category. The states have no other funds which can be utilised for the containment of outbreaks. This has to be corrected. Biological disasters must be brought under the purview of CRF/NCCF.
Need for Enhanced International Collaboration: Epidemics do not respect national borders. As international travel is easy, biological agents need to be tracked so that they do not enter new regions across the boundaries. This aspect has made international collaboration crucial for epidemic control. International organisations like the World Health Organization (WHO), Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), Office International.
Effective Implementation of Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention:
Development of critical infrastructure for management of biological emergencies – The development of a laboratory network including national/state level referral laboratories, and district level diagnostic laboratories with medical colleges to confirm diagnosis under a single integrated framework. Stockpile of Drugs/Vaccines/ Disinfectants/Insecticides/PPE
Psycho-social Care There are some critical deficiencies in the provision of psycho-social care. The routine training of medical undergraduates, nurses and health workers for mental health services is grossly inadequate. There is virtually no emphasis on the mental health aspects of disasters even in the routine postgraduate training in psychiatry.
UPSC Current Affairs: The Economic Reforms - Looking back to look ahead| Page – 06 UPSC Syllabus: GS Paper III – Indian Economy
Sub Theme: Challenges of India economy | UPSC
The GDP size of India has increased from $275 bn to $ 2.9 trillion. 5th largest economy in the world. Fastest growing economy prior to Covid-19 pandemic. Despite these sustained and credible gains, there are some important aspects which we have neglected so far. India has a vision of $ 5 trillion economy by the end of 2025 and vision of doubling farmers' income by end of 2022. So, what should be done to achieve such ambitious goals?
Human Capital Formation:
Education: India's expenditure of 3% on education is much below the target of 6%. Similarly, expenditure on health has remained quite lower at 1.5% as against the mandated 3%.
PLFS Report 2017-18: Only 13% of workforce in age-group (15-59) training. 2%- formal training; 11%-Informal training.
The employment elasticity is hardly around 0.1 which means every 1% increase in GDP growth rate leads to 0.1% increase in employment creation. Apart from low quantity of jobs, concerns have also been raised with respect to poor quality of jobs. 90% of India's workforce is employed in informal sector which is characterised by low wages, poor productivity and lack of access to social security benefits. Hence, there is a need to create high-paying, high-productivity formal sector jobs.
Implications: Lower Human Capital formation; World Economic Forum's Global Human Capital Report 2017- India (103); China (34)
Strategy: Higher Investment in Human Capital Formation
Present Status: The share of manufacturing sector to India's GDP has remained stagnant at 16-17% since 1991 reforms. Instead of focussing on labour intensive industries, the manufacturing sector has come to be dominated by capital intensive Industries. Manufacturing sector has come to be dominated by MSMEs which account for around 45% of manufacturing output. But these MSMEs are quite smaller.
Strategy: Facilitate access to factors of production- land, labour, capital etc; Plug and Play model; Incentives to Industries for adoption of technology
Present Status: Increase in the overall production of food grains without any commensurate increase in income levels of farmers. In spite of being the one of the largest producers of food grains, India's share in global export of agricultural commodities has remained stagnant at 2% (9th Rank).
Strategy: Implement the recommendations of Dalwai Panel on Doubling Farmers' income
Poor Innovation Ecosystem: The R&D Expenditure as % of GDP at 0.7% has remained stagnant in the last 2 decades. Unlike developed economies, the R&D expenditure in India is mainly driven by public sector. The private sector investment in R&D needs to be substantially enhanced.
UPSC Current Affairs: Vidyanjali 2.0 Scheme | Page – 10
UPSC Syllabus: GS Paper II – Social justice
Sub Theme: Vidyanjali scheme | UPSC
Vidyanjali is an initiative taken by the Ministry of Education with the aim to strengthen Schools through community and private sector involvement in schools across the country.
This initiative would connect schools with varied volunteers from the Indian Diaspora namely, young professionals, school alumni, in service and retired teachers / Government officials / professionals and many others.
Vidyanjali has two verticals:
- Participate in school Service/Activity
where volunteer can support and strengthen the government and government aided schools.